Duration: 01:26 minutes Upload Time: 07-08-16 01:19:28 User: hellsunicorn :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: Yes, by all means, eliminate the 3 honest candidates so we can have a REAL debate. |
|
Comments | |
roxannebiggirlhd ::: Favorites hot adults on webcam in your AREA! CAMAZONCAMS dot COM 07-08-21 03:57:39 __________________________________________________ | |
hellsunicorn ::: Favorites He is well qualified, he is also wrong on several key issues, the main one being his solution to the alleged issue of Global Warming. I'm not voting for one of the mainline candidates precisely because I don't believe America's soverignty is to be given up for world government, and Gravel is all but doing the same in the name of a scientific theory that there is not consensus on. 07-08-20 01:32:06 __________________________________________________ | |
oldhacks ::: Favorites you say I'm nuts? I say you're weak for not thinking its possible for us to buy back the whitehouse. they dont have that much money. 25,000,000 dollars could be raised in a flash if the American people weren't so brainwahsed into fealing helpless to stop the "big boys" as you put it. there are no big boys. only ones perceived and delivered as such. ANyone can run for president and the person most qualified should win not the person with the most money. Gravel is far and wide more qualified. 07-08-19 11:45:54 __________________________________________________ | |
hellsunicorn ::: Favorites Ross Perot wasn't a kook, he was simply not experienced enough to deal with the ridiculous nature of modern American politics. He had a lot of good ideas, just not a lot of tact. I do plan to send money to Mike Gravel because I will take him over any other candidate with the exception of Ron Paul, who currently has my support. Besides, I am wary of supporting any candidate who favors a socialized health care system, it is a back door to tyranny. 07-08-17 21:04:55 __________________________________________________ | |
Commando303X ::: Favorites Also, I doubt Paul sells his merchandise "at cost"; what the hell would be the point of doing so? Just to advertise? There must be some profit made, which goes toward his campaign. If I'm wrong about this, please post a reference stating as much. 07-08-17 18:25:47 __________________________________________________ | |
Commando303X ::: Favorites You're claiming that Paul's greatest shortcoming is his lack of money, and that's simply not true. Paul has big problems within his party, and that's likely his greatest political challenge. In this quarter, Paul's raised more money than John McCain, so he's not doing all that badly financially. It's fine to contribute to the candidate you support, but it's not right to make his or her situation seem worse than it is in the hope of raising more. 07-08-17 18:25:05 __________________________________________________ | |
oldhacks ::: Favorites you're opinion isn't rooted in wisdom. ROn Paul is just a kook from texas remember ross perot? Mike Gravel is making history chump. Either get with it or get off of it. 07-08-17 15:49:12 __________________________________________________ | |
BoruJudasDedrich ::: Favorites Actually, I just learned he sells his merchandise at cost. So please just donate. And you are nuts to think he can compete with the big boys without millions more. Remember Ames? 07-08-17 11:35:26 __________________________________________________ | |
hellsunicorn ::: Favorites I'm looking into getting a better microphone actually, a lot of my video equipment is outdated and shot. 07-08-17 09:50:38 __________________________________________________ | |
DavidThePatriot ::: Favorites hardcore, accurate, and hilarious... 5 stars... 07-08-17 03:25:16 __________________________________________________ |
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Idiots 'R' Us
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment